What is Rabbit Finance (RABBIT) crypto coin? Here's the real story
Oct, 21 2025
Rabbit Finance (RABBIT) is a cryptocurrency token that launched in May 2021 on the Binance Smart Chain. At first glance, it promised something exciting: leveraged yield farming with up to 10X returns for small investors. But today, that promise has collapsed into near-total obscurity.
RABBIT was designed as a BEP-20 token to let users borrow against their crypto deposits and farm yields with borrowed funds. The idea was simple - if you only had $100, you could borrow up to $900 more and farm with $1,000 total. That’s the 10X leverage claim. It sounded like a way for beginners to compete with big players in DeFi. But in practice, it never worked.
By late 2023, the trading volume for RABBIT was barely $15 per day. Some platforms reported $0. Others showed $88. The price hovered around $0.0004 - down over 96% from its all-time high of $0.0125. That’s not volatility. That’s death. When a token can’t move more than a few cents in a 24-hour window, it means no one is buying or selling. No one cares.
The market cap tells the same story. At its peak, RABBIT was valued at under $50,000. Today, CoinMarketCap lists it at $0. CoinGecko and CoinLore show figures between $45,000 and $48,000 - numbers so small they’re irrelevant in the crypto world. Compare that to Aave, which sits at over $1 billion, or even small DeFi tokens that manage $10 million. RABBIT isn’t just small - it’s invisible.
There’s no active development. No GitHub commits since 2021. No updates on the website. The Wayback Machine shows the project’s site hasn’t changed in years - just a basic token page with no docs, no code, no roadmap. No developer has touched the code in over two years. That’s not a delay. That’s abandonment.
The community is gone too. There are no active Telegram groups. No real Twitter following. Reddit threads about RABBIT are empty. Even the 47,000 wallet holders listed on CoinMarketCap? Those are likely fake. Chainalysis found that low-liquidity tokens often inflate holder counts by sending tokens to dead wallets or airdrop bots. Real users don’t hold a token that can’t be traded.
Security is another red flag. No reputable audit firm - not CertiK, not OpenZeppelin - has ever reviewed Rabbit Finance’s code. There’s no public audit report. No bug bounty program. No security team. In DeFi, that’s a death sentence. If you’re lending or borrowing with a token that hasn’t been audited, you’re gambling with your money. And RABBIT offers no safety net.
Even the supply numbers don’t add up. CoinLore says there are 179 million RABBIT in total supply. CoinMarketCap says zero. That kind of contradiction doesn’t happen by accident. It happens when a project loses control of its data - or worse, when nobody’s even looking anymore.
What’s worse, RABBIT doesn’t even trade on major exchanges. You won’t find it on Binance, KuCoin, or Coinbase. It’s only listed on tiny decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap, and even there, liquidity is so thin that a single trade can move the price 10%. That’s not a market. That’s a trap.
The Binance Smart Chain has seen hundreds of projects like this. In 2022 and 2023, over 70% of tokens with market caps under $100,000 vanished. They didn’t fail because they were bad ideas - they failed because they never attracted real users. RABBIT was one of them. It had no marketing budget, no community building, no real utility beyond a leveraged farming gimmick that never worked.
And now, regulators are watching. The SEC has been targeting low-volume, low-liquidity tokens as potential unregistered securities. If no one is trading it, if there’s no real use case, and if the team disappeared - that’s exactly the kind of token regulators flag. You don’t want to be holding something that could get delisted overnight with no warning.
If you’re thinking about buying RABBIT because it’s cheap, think again. A $0.0004 price doesn’t mean it’s undervalued. It means it’s worthless. You’re not getting a bargain. You’re buying a ghost.
There’s no recovery in sight. Messari’s 2023 report found that projects failing to hit $1 million in market cap within 18 months have a 98.7% chance of dying within three years. Rabbit Finance missed that mark by 20 times. It’s not coming back.
For real DeFi users, the lesson is clear: don’t chase low-price tokens. Don’t believe in 10X leverage promises from anonymous teams. Look for projects with active code, audited contracts, real trading volume, and a community that talks about more than just price. RABBIT has none of that.
It’s not a crypto coin you invest in. It’s a warning sign.
John E Owren
October 21, 2025 AT 23:07Rabbit Finance was a classic case of a team chasing hype instead of building something real. No audit, no code updates, no community - just a whitepaper and a promise of 10X returns. I’ve seen this movie before. It always ends the same way.
Don’t confuse low price with value. A token trading at $0.0004 isn’t a bargain - it’s a graveyard.
If you’re still holding RABBIT, you’re not investing. You’re hoping.
Joseph Eckelkamp
October 22, 2025 AT 11:07Let’s be brutally honest: RABBIT wasn’t a failure - it was a premeditated exit scam disguised as DeFi innovation. The 10X leverage? A bait-and-switch wrapped in jargon. The ‘community’? Bot wallets. The ‘team’? Ghosts with GitHub usernames.
And yet… people still buy it. Why? Because they think ‘cheap’ means ‘undervalued.’ No. It means ‘unwanted.’
There’s a difference between a speculative asset and a zombie asset. RABBIT is the latter - and it’s still walking around, fooling the oblivious.
Patrick Rocillo
October 23, 2025 AT 09:44Bro. RABBIT is the crypto equivalent of a dead phone battery that still shows 1% charge. 😅
You think you’re getting a deal? Nah. You’re just the last sucker holding the bag while the devs vanished into the Bermuda Triangle of DeFi.
Even the charts look bored. Like, ‘seriously? Again?’
And the supply numbers? CoinMarketCap says zero, CoinLore says 179M - someone’s got a spreadsheet glitch or a ghostwriter. Either way, it’s chaos.
Don’t touch it. Seriously. I’ve seen people lose rent money on this. Just… don’t.
There are 10,000 better tokens with real teams and actual code. Go find one. 🙏
Aniket Sable
October 25, 2025 AT 02:56India me bhi yeh project chal raha tha kya? 😅
Low price = low risk? No no no. Low price = low trust.
People think they can get rich quick with these coins. But after 2 years, no one even talks about it.
Just buy bitcoin or ethereum. Safe. Simple. No drama.
Save your money. Not for rabbit. For your future.
Santosh harnaval
October 25, 2025 AT 22:29Dead coin. Move on.
Claymore girl Claymoreanime
October 26, 2025 AT 20:38How is this even still a topic? Did someone find a dusty wallet with 10,000 RABBIT tokens and think they struck gold? This isn’t a crypto project - it’s a museum exhibit titled ‘How Not To Build A Token.’
Anyone who buys this now is either delusional or actively trying to fund the next SEC enforcement case. I’m not even mad - I’m just… disappointed. You had one job: read the whitepaper. You failed.
And yet, here we are. The crypto equivalent of a 1998 Nokia with a broken screen being sold as a ‘vintage collectible.’
Alex Horville
October 27, 2025 AT 19:01Y’all act like this is some grand conspiracy. It’s not. It’s just capitalism. People want to get rich fast. So they chase the shiny new thing. When it dies? They cry. Then they move on.
It’s not RABBIT’s fault it failed. It’s the buyers’ fault for not doing their homework.
And don’t give me that ‘regulators are watching’ nonsense. The SEC doesn’t care about tokens with $50K market caps. They’re chasing the big boys.
Stop overthinking. Stop overanalyzing. Just don’t buy the garbage.
Marianne Sivertsen
October 28, 2025 AT 14:17I remember when I first saw RABBIT. I thought, ‘Maybe this is the one.’ I even staked a little. Then I checked the liquidity pool. $15 per day? That’s not a market - that’s a donation jar.
It’s sad, really. People pour their hopes into these projects, thinking the next big thing is just one click away.
But the truth? Real DeFi isn’t about leverage. It’s about transparency. It’s about code that moves. It’s about teams that show up.
RABBIT didn’t show up. And that’s why it’s gone.
Don’t mourn it. Learn from it.
Shruti rana Rana
October 29, 2025 AT 09:54Oh my goodness! This is such a heartbreaking story! 💔
Rabbit Finance was supposed to be the little engine that could - but the tracks were made of sand. No audit? No updates? No community? How could anyone believe in this? 🤕
It’s like planting a seed in a desert and expecting a forest. 🌵❌
India has so many brilliant devs - why did no one from our community build something real instead? This is why we must educate our youth about crypto - not just the hype, but the truth.
Rest in peace, RABBIT. You were a lesson, not a legacy.
Stephanie Alya
October 30, 2025 AT 07:55Price = $0.0004? Cool. That means I can buy 10 million coins for $4. Right? 😏
Wrong.
You’re not buying an asset. You’re buying a meme. A ghost story. A digital tombstone.
And no, your ‘strategy’ of ‘buy low, wait for pump’ won’t work here - because there’s no one left to pump it.
Just delete the wallet. Save your sanity.
olufunmi ajibade
October 31, 2025 AT 03:30Let me tell you something - this isn’t just about RABBIT. This is about how people treat crypto like a casino and call it investing.
Every week, someone in Nigeria or Ghana or Kenya buys a token with zero liquidity because ‘it’s cheap.’ Then they scream when it dies.
It’s not the project’s fault. It’s the mindset.
You don’t invest in ghosts. You invest in teams that show up, code that moves, and liquidity that breathes.
RABBIT didn’t breathe. It just exhaled - and vanished.
Chris Houser
October 31, 2025 AT 22:50Y’all are overcomplicating this. RABBIT was a rug pull with a whitepaper. That’s it.
Don’t waste time analyzing the supply numbers or the trading volume - it’s a dead project. The devs cashed out, burned the docs, and moved on.
My advice? If you’re still holding it, sell whatever’s left. Even if it’s $0.01. Get out. Clean your wallet. Don’t look back.
And if you’re thinking of buying? Just say no. Seriously. Just say no.
William Burns
November 1, 2025 AT 18:25It is, perhaps, a lamentable reflection upon the contemporary financial zeitgeist that a token exhibiting such manifest structural deficiencies - including, but not limited to, the absence of audited smart contracts, non-existent developmental activity, and liquidity metrics approximating zero - continues to be referenced in any substantive discourse.
One must question the epistemological foundations of retail investor behavior when such a project garners even marginal attention. The very notion of ‘cheap’ as an investment criterion reveals a profound misunderstanding of capital allocation, market efficiency, and risk assessment.
It is not merely that RABBIT is worthless - it is that its continued mention constitutes a pedagogical failure of the first order.